Four independent witnesses saw a glowing, rapidly moving object that was evidently a "fireball" meteor.
A University Professor in the South Mountain area supplied statements from four apparently independent witnesses of an aerial event for possible interest.
The four sightings are summarized in Table 5. The preponderance of similar features indicates a single event. Only in the
|NCAS Editors' Note: We have reversed the row and column orientation of this table in the interest of readability|
|Time||9:05 a.m.||9:00 a.m.||9:00 a.m.||10:00 a.m.|
|Location||6 mi. E of city||6 mi. SE of||N of city||6 mi. E of city|
|Color||Brilliant yellow body surrounded by blue green welding color||Bright yellow core, blue-green shell||Glowing (no specific color)||Metallic blue-green glowing|
|Size||200 ft. long 3 ft. diam.||---||---||4 ft. long|
|Speed||Very fast||Very fast||Very fast||Very fast|
|Path||Northward descending toward White Mt.||Northward descending 45° toward White Mt.||Northward descending||Northward straight toward White Mt.|
|Duration||2-3 sec.||---||---||2-3 sec.|
|Distance||1 mi.||1 mi.||Appeared quite far away (couldn't estimate)||150 ft. ahead of car|
|Disappearance||Vanished on course toward base of mountains||Exploded or deteriorated in air||---||---|
|Other||Short tapered tail||Short tail Thought it was meteor||---||May have had a tail or exhaust|
fourth sighting is there some reason for doubt. The discrepancies in distance and size are hardly significant because such estimates are characteristically inaccurate. Further, these are consistent in that the ratios of size to distance estimated by witness I and II are roughly similar. These two witnesses were very near each other, and their accounts are similar except for the one hour discrepancy in time. However, witness I was prompted to report his experience by hearing a report of witness IV's experience on the radio, and so may have been influenced by it.
The time discrepancy of one hour has not been accounted for. The preponderance of evidence indicates an error in the time reported by witness IV, but is just as possible that two meteoric fragments came in on similar patterns an hour apart.
Reports of the first and fourth sightings were sent to Dr. Charles P. Olivier of the American Meteor Society, who stated that both accounts showed "every indication of being rather typical daylight fireball reports."
It is concluded that probably a single event was witnessed by four observers, and that the object was a "fireball" meteor.